Telling America s Story Essay -- William F. Lewis Essays

corpulent America s Story The three assays of rhetorical criticism, Telling America s Story Narrative Form and the Regan governing by William F. Lewis, The Promiscuous Audience Controversy and the Emergence of the Early Woman s Rights Movement by Susan Zaeske, and Medicine, Rhetoric, and Euthanasia A Case Study in the whole works of a Postmodern Discourse by Michael J. Hyde each employ a variety of strategies to examine the rhetoric of three distinct situations. This paper lead contract to die each of the essays in a comparative manner. Specific anyy, it will evaluate the introductions, how effectively they are constructed, and how the essays follow according to the expectations set forth in the introductions.In Telling America s Story, Lewis starts by providing a quick explanation of the countrys status as Regan entered office. The referee is instantly introduced to the Western worlds almost gifted communicator. Lewis does not exit the reader with that viewpoint for lo ng as he goes on to explain the views of Regans critics. Arguments of Regans ideology without ideas and the New Republic editors comment that Ronald Regan has never let the facts get in the course of a good story begin to steer the reader toward a more objective state of mind. A fair balance of the dickens viewpoints is kept up(p) throughout the piece, but the overall feel of it seems to be geared toward the latter. It is not until half way down the second page of his essay that Lewis distinctly states his purpose, to fib for the distinctive reputation, style, and effect of Ronald Regans discourse. He even lists the two objectives that his essay will accomplish, which are explained later under headings that bear the same hold as the stated ... ...ike Lewiss topic. The question/answer method is effective in this essay because it gives the reader something to prepare for. The reader knows what to look for in the rest of essay and will be more attentive when reading. She does no t leave the reader hanging the rest of the essay is distinctly laid out and easily answers all questions.The look back of these essays showed that while rhetorical criticism does need to have formal structure, there are many ways for a critic to accomplish their objectives inwardly the check that basic structure. Although it is not always best choice for every situation, I feel that a shorter, more direct approach to an introduction, as in Hydes piece, is the most effective. I also thought that the question/answer format worked well for Zaske. It may have been the topic, but I found that the Hyde essay was the most winning overall. Telling America s Story Essay -- William F. Lewis EssaysTelling America s Story The three essays of rhetorical criticism, Telling America s Story Narrative Form and the Regan Presidency by William F. Lewis, The Promiscuous Audience Controversy and the Emergence of the Early Woman s Rights Movement by Susan Zaeske, and Medicine, Rhe toric, and Euthanasia A Case Study in the Workings of a Postmodern Discourse by Michael J. Hyde each employ a variety of strategies to examine the rhetoric of three distinct situations. This paper will attempt to dissect each of the essays in a comparative manner. Specifically, it will evaluate the introductions, how effectively they are constructed, and how the essays follow according to the expectations set forth in the introductions.In Telling America s Story, Lewis starts by providing a quick explanation of the countrys status as Regan entered office. The reader is instantly introduced to the Western worlds most gifted communicator. Lewis does not leave the reader with that viewpoint for long as he goes on to explain the views of Regans critics. Arguments of Regans ideology without ideas and the New Republic editors comment that Ronald Regan has never let the facts get in the way of a good story begin to steer the reader toward a more objective state of mind. A fair balance of t he two viewpoints is maintained throughout the piece, but the overall feel of it seems to be geared toward the latter. It is not until half way down the second page of his essay that Lewis clearly states his purpose, to account for the distinctive reputation, style, and effect of Ronald Regans discourse. He even lists the two objectives that his essay will accomplish, which are explained later under headings that bear the same name as the stated ... ...ike Lewiss topic. The question/answer method is effective in this essay because it gives the reader something to prepare for. The reader knows what to look for in the rest of essay and will be more attentive when reading. She does not leave the reader hanging the rest of the essay is distinctly laid out and easily answers all questions.The review of these essays showed that while rhetorical criticism does need to have formal structure, there are many ways for a critic to accomplish their objectives within the confines that basic stru cture. Although it is not always best choice for every situation, I feel that a shorter, more direct approach to an introduction, as in Hydes piece, is the most effective. I also thought that the question/answer format worked well for Zaske. It may have been the topic, but I found that the Hyde essay was the most engaging overall.